![sighthound vs securityspy sighthound vs securityspy](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ef/9b/e2/ef9be2e4c1c57e0046eb6a397e610d4c.jpg)
- #Sighthound vs securityspy update
- #Sighthound vs securityspy archive
- #Sighthound vs securityspy password
Webcam integration on macOS Mojave and later
#Sighthound vs securityspy update
We have identified the root cause, and will release the fix in the next minor version update (6.1)ĭeleting clips manually may cause the UI and/or background processes to stall, when attempting to delete the last clip recorded by any particular camera. Using e-mail notifications may cause non-trivial notification delays, which, unfortunately will not be limited to email notifications. It is something we have discovered recently, but it isn’t new to 6.0.
#Sighthound vs securityspy password
The username will be the email associated with your Sighthound account please use password recovery to set up your HappyFox password when logging in for the first time. The URL to the new (or updated) ticket will be provided upon successful submission.
![sighthound vs securityspy sighthound vs securityspy](https://d1mfcqjbhp6mmy.cloudfront.net/home/install-monitor2.png)
Finally, we have moved to a much-improved support platform called HappyFox. Second, the dialog lists all the files that will be submitted along with the ticket, so you will know what kind of information is being sent. Second, slightly more disk space will be consumed when bridging the clips, since we have to preserve a bit more video that otherwise would be deleted when the time limit specified for storing temporary video expires.įirst, we now provide the ability to update a previously opened ticket, rather than always create a new one. First, modifying this settings affects future recordings only: past clips will use the setting active at the time of the recording. With the new option controlling clip fragmentation, current behavior can be preserved, or the clips may be joined, if the object re-appears within a pre-set time distance. Rather than choosing one or the other behavior, we’ve decided to make this a user choice. One of the more annoying behaviors of Sighthound Video for some of us is how the clips are split up whenever the object that is being tracked disappears momentarily: either exiting the frame, or walking behind a tree.Īt the same time, some users may prefer it this way: scrolling through the list of clips allows for a faster review of unique objects seen. So, please make sure you have enough of available RAM before enabling this option. This workaround will no longer be required as of Sighthound Video 6.0: the incoming video can now be buffered in memory, until it is ready to be written to its permanent storage location.Ĭaveat: this will require about 60-100MB more RAM per camera. tmp folder to RAM drive, which is fairly cumbersome. Some users worked around the problem in the past by symlinking. Additionally, it may affect the longevity of the system drive, especially if it is a lower-grade SSD.
#Sighthound vs securityspy archive
The problem with that approach is twofold: if the system drive is different from the video archive drive (which we recommend), the amount of I/O is doubled. While the current incoming chunk of video is being written and processed, it resides in Sighthound Video's data folder on the system volume and then relocates to the video archive specified in settings upon completion. As some of you know, Sighthound Video records incoming video in small (usually two minutes or shorter) chunks. Another long standing request from you has been avoiding frequent writes to the system drive.